Fabula, la recherche en littérature (debats)

Marche de Vienne (11/03/10) et déclaration des 46 ministres de l'enseignement supérieur européen - Budapest-Vienna Declaration on the European Higher Education Area (12/03/10)

Points de vue et débats

Information publiée le dimanche 14 mars 2010 par Bérenger Boulay



_blank

Vidéo de la Marche contre le processus de Bologne et contre la politique européenne en matière d'enseignement, à Vienne, le 11 mars 2010: Vienna March 11 2010 : the international demo (site de Sauvons La Recherche).


Déclaration des 46 ministres de l'enseignement supérieur européen - Budapest-Vienna Declaration on the European Higher Education Area (12/03/10)

Commentaire de Papera: "Les ministres en charge de l'enseignement supérieur des pays impliqués dans le Processus de Bologne ont officiellement créé l'Espace Européen d'Enseignement Supérieur. La déclaration faite le 12 mars 2010 est dégoulinante d'autosatisfaction. Au mépris de tous les mouvements européens de contestation engagés depuis de nombreux mois dans l'enseignement supérieur et la recherche, l'annonce mentionne un partenariat sans précédent mis en oeuvre à tous les niveaux (autorités publiques, institutions, étudiants, statutaires, …) pour appliquer les directives européennes ! Cerise sur le gâteau, le tout serait basé sur "la confiance, la coopération et le respect". De plus, à l'image du discours ministériel français, les "petites réticences" ne proviennent simplement que d'explications insuffisantes et d'incompréhension de la communauté universitaire*. Le processus engagé reste fidèle aux principes déjà engagés : amélioration du système de l'éducation supérieur afin de faire croître la professionnalisation, l'employabilité, la mobilité des acteurs (compatible avec la mise en concurrence exacerbée liée) dans un monde où le Savoir n'est selon eux qu'un "moteur de développement social et économique et d'innovation". La marchandisation de l'enseignement supérieur a toujours de l'avenir."

*cf "Recent protests in some countries, partly directed against developments and measures not related to the Bologna Process, have reminded us that some of the Bologna aims and reforms have not been properly implemented and explained."

Budapest-Vienna Declaration on the European Higher Education Area

March 12, 2010

1. We, the Ministers responsible for higher education in the countries participating in the Bologna Process, met in Budapest and Vienna on March 11 and 12, 2010 to launch the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), as envisaged in the Bologna Declaration of 1999.

2. Based on our agreed criteria for country membership, we welcome Kazakhstan as new participating country of the European Higher Education Area.

3. The Bologna Declaration in 1999 set out a vision for 2010 of an internationally competitive and attractive European Higher Education Area where higher education institutions, supported by strongly committed staff, can fulfil their diverse missions in the knowledge society ; and where students benefiting from mobility with smooth and fair recognition of their qualifications, can find the best suited educational pathways.

4. Since 1999, 47 parties to the European Cultural Convention, have signed up to this vision and have made significant progress towards achieving it. In a unique partnership between public authorities, higher education institutions, students and staff, together with employers, quality assurance agencies, international organisations and European institutions, we have engaged in a series of reforms to build a European Higher Education Area based on trust, cooperation and respect for the diversity of cultures, languages, and higher education systems.

5. The Bologna Process and the resulting European Higher Education Area, being unprecedented examples of regional, cross-border cooperation in higher education, have raised considerable interest in other parts of the world and made European higher education more visible on the global map. We welcome this interest and look forward to intensifying our policy dialogue and cooperation with partners across the world.

6. We have taken note of the independent assessment and the stakeholders' reports. We welcome their affirmation that institutions of higher education, staff and students increasingly identify with the goals of the Bologna Process. While much has been achieved in implementing the Bologna reforms, the reports also illustrate that EHEA action lines such as degree and curriculum reform, quality assurance, recognition, mobility and the social dimension are implemented to varying degrees. Recent protests in some countries, partly directed against developments and measures not related to the Bologna Process, have reminded us that some of the Bologna aims and reforms have not been properly implemented and explained. We acknowledge and will listen to the critical voices raised among staff and students. We note that adjustments and further work, involving staff and students, are necessary at European, national, and especially institutional levels to achieve the European Higher Education Area as we envisage it.

7. We, the Ministers, are committed to the full and proper implementation of the agreed objectives and the agenda for the next decade set by the Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Communiqué. In close cooperation with higher education institutions, staff, students and other stakeholders, we will step up our efforts to accomplish the reforms already underway to enable students and staff to be mobile, to improve teaching and learning in higher education institutions, to enhance graduate employability, and to provide quality higher education for all. At national level, we also strive to improve communication on and understanding of the Bologna Process among all stakeholders and society as a whole.

8. We, the Ministers, recommit to academic freedom as well as autonomy and accountability of higher education institutions as principles of the European Higher Education Area and underline the role the higher education institutions play in fostering peaceful democratic societies and strengthening social cohesion.

9. We acknowledge the key role of the academic community - institutional leaders, teachers, researchers, administrative staff and students - in making the European Higher Education Area a reality, providing the learners with the opportunity to acquire knowledge, skills and competences furthering their careers and lives as democratic citizens as well as their personal development. We recognise that a more supportive environment for the staff to fulfil their tasks, is needed. We commit ourselves to working towards a more effective inclusion of higher education staff and students in the implementation and further development of the EHEA. We fully support staff and student participation in decision-making structures at European, national and institutional levels.

10. We call upon all actors involved to facilitate an inspiring working and learning environment and to foster student-centred learning as a way of empowering the learner in all forms of education, providing the best solution for sustainable and flexible learning paths. This also requires the cooperation of teachers and researchers in international networks.

11. We, the Ministers, reaffirm that higher education is a public responsibility. We commit ourselves, notwithstanding these difficult economic times, to ensuring that higher education institutions have the necessary resources within a framework established and overseen by public authorities. We are convinced that higher education is a major driver for social and economic development and for innovation in an increasingly knowledge-driven world. We shall therefore increase our efforts on the social dimension in order to provide equal opportunities to quality education, paying particular attention to underrepresented groups.

12. We, the Ministers responsible for the European Higher Education Area, ask the Bologna Follow-up Group to propose measures to facilitate the proper and full implementation of the agreed Bologna principles and action lines across the European Higher Education Area, especially at the national and institutional levels, among others by developing additional working methods, such as peer learning, study visits and other information sharing activities. By continuously developing, enhancing and strengthening the European Higher Education Area and taking further the synergies with the European Research Area, Europe will be able to successfully face the challenges of the next decade.

13. Our next Ministerial Meeting to take stock of progress and to drive the Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve agenda forward, will be hosted by Romania in Bucharest on 26-27 April 2012




Points de vue et débats :

Lettre d’A. Fraïsse, présidente de l’université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3 à F. Hollande (7/2/2012)

Motion de la 21e section du CNU sur l'évaluation des enseignants-chercheurs (2/2/12)

"N’oublions pas la formation des enseignants, enjeu national pour 2012". Appel pour une refonte de la formation des enseignants (3/2/12)

"La fausse autonomie universitaire", par P. Jourde (blog BibliObs)

L'enseignements des lettres classiques à la rentrée 2012 (motion CNARELA du 14/01/12)

Pétition contre la criminalisation d'un canular et du mouvement social à l'Ens (février 2012)

"Proposition de loi Grosperrin : la persévérance dans l’erreur" (communiqué de la Société des Agrégés, 24/01/2012)

"IUFM : Après le démantèlement, l’éradication", par J.-L. Auduc (cafepedagogique.net)

"Ne bradons pas les diplômes de licence!" (tribune, Le Monde, 19/1/12)

"Les Célébrations nationales 2012 inaugurées par une polémique", par P. Assouline (blog)

"Privatiser la formation des enseignants : l’UMP ouvre la brèche", par L. Delaporte (Mediapart, 19/1/2012)

"Universitaires et chercheurs s’inquiètent des ambiguïtés de F. Hollande", par L. Delaporte (Médiapart, 18/1/ 12)

Présidentielle 2012: débat sur l’enseignement de l’histoire de l’art dans l’enseignement secondaire et la formation de ses enseignants dans le Supérieur (21/1/12)

Fondation Copernic, L'éducation nationale en danger

"Les représentants de la communauté universitaire boycottent une réunion avec le ministère" (20minutes.fr, 1611/2012)

"Budget des universités : le réalité rattrape le gouvernement", par B. Monthubert (site Parti socialiste)

"Libraires épuisés", par V. Chabault (lavidesidees.fr)

"Violence scolaire : L'enquête de Seine-Saint-Denis inverse les perspectives", par F. Jarraud (cafepedagogique.net)

Lettre du président de la région Languedoc-Roussillon aux responsables de "ses" universités

"La face cachée de l'autonomie des facs": l'exemple de l'UPPA (L'Humanité, 6/1/12)

"Étudiants étrangers: pourquoi le gouvernement a reculé", par M. Bellan (Lesechos.fr, 26/12/11)

"Quand Gallica vend du porno…" (BibliObs)

"L'université est universelle": pétition contre la circulaire Guéant (21/12/11)

"Initiatives d'excellence : stress et baisse des publications au menu des enseignants-chercheurs" (VousNousIls: l'e-mag de l'éducation)

Dialogue rompu au sein du CA de l'Université de Haute-Alsace (DNA, 19/12/11)

Fil d'informations RSS Fil d'information RSS   Fabula sur Facebook Fabula sur Facebook   Fabula sur Twitter Fabula sur Twitter