Agenda
Événements & colloques
100th Anniversary of Russian formalism (1913-2013)

100th Anniversary of Russian formalism (1913-2013)

Publié le par Matthieu Vernet (Source : John Pier)

Congress 100th anniversary of Russian formalism (1913-2013)

August 25-29, 2013, Moscow

 

Hosted by:

*National Research University Higher School of Economicshttp://www.hse.ru/en/#

*Russian State University for the Humanities* <http://www.rggu.ru/>

 

Organized by:

*National Research University Higher School of Economics http://www.hse.ru/en/#

Russian State University for the Humanities http://www.rggu.ru/

*Institute of the World Culture of Lomonosov Moscow State University http://www.imk.msu.ru/

*The Institute of Slavic Studies http://www.inslav.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=848&Itemid=68

*V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute http://www.ruslang.ru/

*A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature http://www.imli.ru/

 

The Congress Chairman:

*Vyacheslav Vsevolodovich Ivanov

http://www.slavic.ucla.edu/people/faculty/ivanov/

 

Keynote Speakers:

*John Ellis Bowlt (University of Southern California)      http://dornsife.usc.edu/cf/cslc/cslc_faculty_display.cfm?person_id=1003122

Catherine Depretto (Paris Sorbonne University)

http://www.paris-sorbonne.fr/l-universite/nos-enseignants-chercheurs/article/depretto-catherine

*Viacheslav Vsevolodovich Ivanov (MSU, UCLA, RSUH)

http://www.slavic.ucla.edu/people/faculty/ivanov/

*Aage A. Hansen-Love (Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich)

http://www.sprach-und-literaturwissenschaften.uni-muenchen.de/personen/dept_2/hansen_loeve/index.html

*Eero Aarne Pekka Tarasti (University of Helsinki)

http://www.helsinki.fi/semiotics/structure/staff.html

The historic report of 20-year-old Viktor Shklovsky, "The Place of Futurism in the History of the Language," presented in December 1913 at the St. Petersburg art cabaret "Stray Dog," is considered the beginning of a new literary theory, Russian Formalism. The message of the report was later put in writing in his first theoretical work, "Resurrection of the Word" (1914),which, together with his second keynote article entitled "Art as Device" (1917), became the manifesto of OPOYAZ (Society for the study of the poetic language).

At present, the international significance of the Russian formalist school has become obvious. The methods of Russian formalism influenced a much wider range of disciplines than what Shklovsky described in his very first pronouncement. While in the beginning Shklovsky concentrated mainly on literature as an independent field of art. Later his colleagues (in particular, Roman Jakobson and Yuri Tynyanov) as early as in 1928 began consistent dissemination of new methods of analysis of the literature on culture in general.

Fleeing from the Nazi and other totalitarian regimes, Roman Jakobson first moved to Prague, then to Scandinavia, and finally to New York; during these forced travels, he kept contributing greatly to both the organization of new schools and the promotion and development of the basic principles of the formal study of languages of culture. Jakobson's activity led to the growth of authority of linguistics and to so-called "linguistic turn" in the social sciences in the mid-20th century and the emergence of an interdisciplinary paradigm of structuralism.

The impact of Russian Formalism on the 20th century humanities is immense and yet requires reconsideration, particularly when we think of its heritage in relation to the recent scholarship that challenges or even denies ‘formalism’ in the broad sense.

However, attempts to use languages resembling that of formalism have been made in different fields of research.

The Congress 100th Anniversary of Russian Formalism (1913-2013) to be held by the leading Russian humanitarian centres invites papers on a range of related subjects /* (see Application)*/

The aim of the Congress is to trace the influence of the formalist intellectual thinking on the contemporary humanitarian disciplines, to re-estimate the interdisciplinary potential of the formalist method, and to define the movement's place in 20th-century intellectual history.