Essai
Nouvelle parution
K. Chuh, The Difference Aesthetics Makes: On the Humanities “After Man”

K. Chuh, The Difference Aesthetics Makes: On the Humanities “After Man”

Publié le par Aurelien Maignant

The Difference Aesthetics Makes: On the Humanities “After Man”

Kandice Chuh

 

Duke University Press

ISBN : 978-1-4780-0092-1

23,95 $

192 p.

 

PRÉSENTATION

In The Difference Aesthetics Makes cultural critic Kandice Chuh asks what the humanities might be and do if organized around what she calls “illiberal humanism” instead of around the Western European tradition of liberal humanism that undergirds the humanities in their received form. Recognizing that the liberal humanities contribute to the reproduction of the subjugation that accompanies liberalism's definition of the human, Chuh argues that instead of defending the humanities, as has been widely called for in recent years, we should radically remake them. Chuh proposes that the work of artists and writers like Lan Samantha Chang, Carrie Mae Weems, Langston Hughes, Leslie Marmon Silko, Allan deSouza, Monique Truong, and others brings to bear ways of being and knowing that delegitimize liberal humanism in favor of more robust, capacious, and worldly senses of the human and the humanities. Chuh presents the aesthetics of illiberal humanism as vital to the creation of sensibilities and worlds capable of making life and lives flourish.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface
Introduction. The Difference Aesthetics Makes
1. Knowledge under cover
2. Pedagogies of Liberal Humanism
3. Making Sense Otherwise
4. Mis/Taken Universals
Conclusion. On the Humanities After Man
Postscript
Notes
Bibliography
Index

 

KANDICE CHUH

Kandice Chuh is Professor of English and American Studies at The Graduate Center, City University of New York, author of Imagine Otherwise: On Asian Americanist Critique, and coeditor of Orientations: Mapping Studies in the Asian Diaspora, both also published by Duke University Press.

 

REVIEWS

The Difference Aesthetics Makes reconsiders the centrality of aesthetics to the humanities and elaborates an aesthetics of ‘illiberal’ humanism that emerges from relations of difference, not identity; from dissensus, not consensus. This timely and significant book will be of crucial importance for readers in English, American studies, ethnic studies, anthropology, art history, and beyond.” — Lisa Lowe, author of, The Intimacies of Four Continents

“Reading various texts to demonstrate how minority literature presents itself as the productive other to dominant articulations of the aesthetic, Kandice Chuh makes significant interventions in inquiries around the relationship between politics and aesthetics, the humanities as a site of critical alternatives, and the role that minority discourse plays in those inquiries. An exciting and ambitious book.” — Roderick A. Ferguson, author of, One-Dimensional Queer